PENGGUNAAN SIMULASI KOMPUTER UNTUK OPTIMALISASI KEBUTUHAN ALAT BERAT PEKERJAAN PEMINDAHAN TANAH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.rekayasasipil.2021.015.02.9Keywords:
Discrete event simulation, earthmoving, productivity-cost index, optimization in constructionAbstract
Earthmoving work is often performed based on simple calculation and experience. This practice may work on a small project. However, for a big project in which a large excavation volume must be accomplished, managing the work become more complex. Some different equipment in various types and sizes need to be assigned. Project managers should determine the best combination of equipment with the correct amount to achieve a satisfactory result. This research was conducted to optimize the productivity-cost index in earthmoving works using a discrete event simulation (DES) analysis in four different schemes. An underpass project in Yogyakarta was used as the case study. The optimal combination of equipment was determined by the highest value of the productivity-cost index. The result shows that the highest productivity-cost index of 18.22 was achieved by the combination of four big excavators and 90 small trucks (2E4 90D1). It offered a better productivity-cost index compare to the contractor’s existing equipment combination which could only reach a productivity-cost index of 5.3.References
Shawki, K. M., Kilani, K., & Gomaa, M. A, Analysis of earthmoving systems using discrete-event simulation. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 54(3), 533–540, 2015.
Parente, M., Correia, A. G., & Cortez, P., A Novel Integrated Optimization System for Earthwork Tasks. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 3601–3610, 2016.
Yi, C., & Lu, M., A Simulation-based Earthmoving Fleet Optimization Platform (SEFOP) for truck/Excavator selection in rough grading project. ISARC 2018 - 35th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction and International AEC/FM Hackathon: The Future of Building Things, Isarc, 2018
Abourizk, S., Role of simulation in construction engineering and management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(10), 1140–1153, 2010.
Abdelmegid, M. A., González, V. A., Poshdar, M., O’Sullivan, M., Walker, C. G., & Ying, F., Barriers to adopting simulation modelling in construction industry. Automation in Construction, 111(June 2019), 103046, 2020.
Behzadan, A. H., Menassa, C. C., Tishman, J. L., & Pradhan, A. R., Enabling real time simulation of architecture, engineering, construction, and facility management (AEC/FM) systems: A review of formalism, model architecture, and data representation. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 20, 1–23, 2015.
Wainer, G. A., & Mosterman, P. J., Discrete-event modeling and simulation: Theory and applications. In CRC Press. CRC Press, 2011
Kyu Choi, B., & Kang, D., Modeling and Simulation of Discrete-Event Systems. In Wiley. Wiley,2013
Martinez, J. C., Methodology for conducting discrete-event simulation studies in construction engineering and management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(1), 3–16, 2010.
Ramadhani A., Optimalisasi Penggunaan Alat Berat Pada Pekerjaan Galian Tanah di Proyek Jalan Tol Nganjuk-Kertosono,
Publikasi Internal Fakultas Teknik Universitas Brawijaya, 2017.
Bina Marga, Analisa Harga Satuan Pekerjaan, Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum. 2017
Departemen Pekerjaan Umum. Pedoman Perhitungan Harga Satuan Pekerjaan dengan Menggunakan Alat Berat. 1998
Komatsu, Specification & Aplication Handbook 27thEd, 2006.
Peurifoy, R.L, Schexnayder, C.J, Shapira, A. Construction
Planning, Equipment, and Methods 7th Edition. McGraw Hill. 2006.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Rekayasa Sipil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
