Studi Eksperimental: Perilaku Siklik Anticompression Split-K Braced Steel Frame
Keywords:anticompression brace, buckling failure, cyclic behaviour, cyclic test, tension-only brace
AbstractThis paper presents an experimental study on the behaviour of a braced steel frame with a proposed system: anticompression brace system (ABS) subjected to cyclic lateral loads. The ABS is proposed to deal with common brace buckling problems. In the study, split-K braced steel frames: with ABS and with ordinary brace system (OBS) were used as speciments. Cyclic loading tests were conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed system in preventing the brace to buckle and to obtain the behaviour of the frame with ABS compared to the frame with OBS under cyclic quasistatic loading. From the cyclic tests, it was observed that the proposed system worked in preventing the braces to buckle, hence, the aimed state, â€œbuckling preventionâ€ was achieved. The results of the study also show that the frame with ABS had a lower initial stiffness compared to the frame with OBS, nevertheless, after exceeding drift ratio of 0.85% based on raw data or 0.64% based on fitted-curves, the frame with ABS exhibited good behaviour through lower degradations in stiffness and cyclic strength relative to the frame with OBS that experienced sudden and greater degradations.Â
Gioncu, V., & Mazzolani, F. M. (2014). Seismic Design of Steel Structures. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Wang, W., Zhou, Q., Chen, Y., Tong, L., & Chan, T.-M. (2013). Experimental and Numerical Investigation on Full-Scale Tension-Only Concentrically Braced Steel Beam-Through Frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 80, 369-385.
Bruneau, M., Uang, C.-M., & Sabelli, R. (2011). Ductile Design of Steel Structures. New York: McGraw Hill.
Chi, P., Tian, W., Guo, T., Cao, D., & Dong, J. (2019). Parametric Study on the Seismic Response of Steel-Framed Buildings with Self-Centering Tension-Only Braces. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019, 9204362.
Papagiannopoulos, G. A. (2018). On the Seismic Behaviour of Tension-Only Concentrically Braced Steel Structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 115, 27-35.
Zahrai, S. M., Mousavi, S. A., & Saatcioglu, M. (2017). Analytical Study on Seismic Behavior of Proposed Hybrid Tensionâ€Only Braced Frames. Struct. Design Tall Spec. Build, doi: 10.1002/tal.1310.
Elnashai, A. S., & Sarno, L. D. (2015). Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering: From Source to Fragility. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
Pawirodikromo, W. (2017). Analisis Dinamik Struktur. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Sullivan, T. J., Calvi, G. M., & Priestley, M. N. (2004). Initial Stiffness Versus Secant Stiffness in Displacement Based Design. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver
Park, R. (1989). Evaluation of Ductility of Structures and Structural Assemblages from Laboratory Testing. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 22(3), 155-166.
Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2009). FEMA P440A: Effect of Strength and Stiffness Degradation on Seismic Response. Washington D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Segui, W. T. (2013). Steel Design. Stamford: Cengage Learning.
Dewi, S. M., & Dobana, K. (2007). Stabilitas Bangunan Baja. Malang: Bargie Media.
Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2007). FEMA 461: Interim Testing Protocols for Determining the Seismic Performance Characteristics of Structural and Nonstructural Components. Washington D.C: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Devore, J. L. (2012). Probability and Statistics for Engineering and Sciences. Boston: Cengage/Cole, Cengage Learning.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 Rekayasa Sipil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License